walrus: have long tusk like teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.61
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, moose
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tusk like teeth 1.00
have tusk like teeth 0.99
have long tusk 0.96
has physical part tusk 0.94
have long teeth 0.86
have long tusks 0.83
has physical part tusks 0.82
have big tusks 0.82
has physical part teeth 0.81
has physical part whiskers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part tusk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part tusk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part tusk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part tusks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part tusks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part tusks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part tusk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(walrus, have long tusks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long tusks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long tusk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have big tusks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(walrus, have big tusks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(walrus, have big tusks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walrus, have big tusks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part tusks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(walrus, have long tusk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)