wart: has state virus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.61
, growth
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.56
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.55
, bump
Weight: 0.55
Siblings genital herpes
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.34
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.34
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state virus 1.00
virus 0.97
has state disease 0.84
be like warts caused by virus 0.84
has state illness 0.79
protect body from infection 0.78
is contagious disease 0.77
is most contagious disease 0.77
be classified as infection 0.77
be called disease 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wart, has state virus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has state illness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wart, has state virus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(genital herpes, is most contagious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(genital herpes, is contagious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lyme disease, has state illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has state illness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wart, has state virus)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wart, virus)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wart, virus)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wart, virus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wart, has state virus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has state illness)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wart, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)