wash cloth: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents linen
Weight: 0.73
, thing
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.63
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings cloth
Weight: 0.37
, car wash
Weight: 0.36
, beach towel
Weight: 0.36
, handkerchief
Weight: 0.35
, washing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
has quality uses 0.89
has quality bad 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cloth, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(handkerchief, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cloth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cloth, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(handkerchief, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(handkerchief, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(washing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(washing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wash cloth, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(wash cloth, has quality uses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality uses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wash cloth, has quality uses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality uses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cloth, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(washing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(handkerchief, has quality bad)