waste: be problem in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in australia 1.00
be issue in australia 0.94
problem for world 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(waste, be problem in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(waste, be issue in australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(waste, be issue in australia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(waste, be issue in australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(waste, be issue in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(waste, problem for world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, be problem in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(waste, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(waste, be problem in australia)