watching: be considered as bad stuff

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as bad stuff 1.00
be considered as stuff 0.97
be considered bad thing 0.92
be considered bad 0.89
be considered thing 0.87
be for time bad 0.83
be in bad 0.83
be considered ok 0.82
be for long time bad 0.81
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for time bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for long time bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(watching, be in bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered ok)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(watching, be for time bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(watching, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(watching, be in bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(watching, be for long time bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(watching, be considered ok)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(watching, be for time bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(watching, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered ok)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(watching, be in bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(watching, be for long time bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(watching, be for time bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watching, be considered ok)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(watching, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, be for long time bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(listening, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)