watching: be in bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bad 1.00
be for time bad 0.91
be considered bad 0.88
be for long time bad 0.87
be in dark bad 0.87
has quality bad 0.87
be considered bad thing 0.84
be considered as bad stuff 0.83
be close bad for eyes 0.81
be bad in bed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(watching, be in bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(watching, be in bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(watching, be in bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(watching, be bad in bed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(watching, be bad in bed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(watching, be bad in bed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(watching, be bad in bed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(watching, be for time bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for time bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, be for long time bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for long time bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(watching, be for time bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(watching, be for time bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(watching, be for long time bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(watching, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(watching, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(watching, be for long time bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(watching, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(watching, be in bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(listening, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(watching, be in bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)