watching: be in dark bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in dark bad 1.00
be in bad 0.87
be for time bad 0.80
be for long time bad 0.79
be close bad for eyes 0.78
be considered bad 0.78
be bad in bed 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
be considered bad thing 0.76
be considered as bad stuff 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(watching, be in dark bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(watching, be in dark bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(watching, be bad in bed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(watching, be bad in bed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(watching, be bad in bed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(watching, be bad in bed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(watching, be in bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(watching, be in bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(watching, be in bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(watching, be for time bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for long time bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(watching, be for time bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watching, be considered bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, be for long time bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(watching, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(watching, be for time bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(watching, be considered bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(watching, be for time bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(watching, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(watching, be close bad for eyes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(watching, be for long time bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(watching, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(watching, be for long time bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered bad thing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(watching, be considered as bad stuff)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(watching, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(watching, be in dark bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(listening, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(watching, be in dark bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)