watching: be vs reading

Property	Similarity
be vs reading	1.00
reading play	0.85
be better reading	0.84
be than reading	0.84
be better than reading	0.82
be easier reading	0.78
be easier than reading	0.77
differ reading	0.77

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(watching, be than reading)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(watching, reading play)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(watching, be than reading)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(watching, reading play)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(watching, reading play)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(watching, differ reading)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(watching, be than reading)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(watching, differ reading)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(watching, reading play)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(watching, differ reading)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(watching, be better than reading)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(watching, be easier than reading)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(watching, be better than reading)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(watching, be easier than reading)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(watching, be better reading)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(watching, be easier reading)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(watching, be better reading)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(watching, differ reading)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(watching, be easier reading)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(watching, be better reading)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(watching, be easier than reading)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than reading)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(watching, be better than reading)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(watching, be easier reading)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(watching, be easier than reading)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(watching, be than reading)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(watching, be easier reading)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watching, be vs reading) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(watching, be better reading)

Parents	service Weight: 0.48 , method Weight: 0.48 , guy Weight: 0.47 , match Weight: 0.47 , thing Weight: 0.46
Siblings	remember Weight: 0.31 , laughing Weight: 0.31 , listening Weight: 0.31 , living thing Weight: 0.31

watching: be vs reading

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings