watching: be better than reading

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than reading 1.00
be better reading 0.98
be than reading 0.97
be easier than reading 0.94
be easier reading 0.91
reading play 0.90
be more impressive reading 0.85
be better than book 0.85
differ reading 0.84
be vs reading 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(listening, be than reading)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(listening, be than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(listening, be than reading)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(watching, be better than reading)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(watching, be than reading)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(watching, be than reading)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(watching, be than reading)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(watching, reading play)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(watching, reading play)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better reading)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(watching, be easier than reading)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(watching, be than reading)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(watching, reading play)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(watching, be easier reading)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(watching, be easier than reading)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(watching, differ reading)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(watching, be better reading)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(watching, differ reading)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(watching, differ reading)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(watching, be easier than reading)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than book)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(watching, be easier than reading)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(watching, be more impressive reading)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watching, be vs reading)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(watching, be vs reading)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(watching, be easier reading)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(watching, differ reading)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(watching, reading play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(watching, be better reading)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(watching, be better than book)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(watching, be more impressive reading)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(watching, be vs reading)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(watching, be better reading)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(watching, be easier reading)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(watching, be vs reading)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(watching, be easier reading)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(watching, be better than book)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(watching, be more impressive reading)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(watching, be more impressive reading)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watching, be better than book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than reading)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be better than reading)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(listening, be than reading)