watching: be better than book

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than book 1.00
be better than reading 0.85
be easier than reading 0.82
be better reading 0.81
be easier reading 0.78
be than reading 0.77
be better than tv 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(listening, be than reading)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(listening, be than reading) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(listening, be than reading)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(watching, be better than book)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be better than reading)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(watching, be than reading)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(watching, be easier than reading)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(watching, be than reading)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(watching, be better than reading)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than book)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watching, be better than book)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(listening, be than reading)