watching: be better than tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tv 1.00
be tv 0.90
watching 3d on tv 0.81
television 0.77
be better than reading 0.77
be better than book 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(watching, be better than tv)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(watching, be tv)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(watching, be tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(watching, be tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(watching, be tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(watching, watching 3d on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(watching, watching 3d on tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(watching, watching 3d on tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(watching, television)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(watching, watching 3d on tv)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(watching, television)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(watching, television)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(watching, television)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(watching, be better than reading)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(watching, be better than reading)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(watching, be better than book)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(watching, be better than reading)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watching, be better than book)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(watching, be better than book)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than book)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than reading)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(watching, be better than tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(watching, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(watching, be better than tv)