water vapor: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.70
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.68
, liquid
Weight: 0.67
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nitrous oxide
Weight: 0.71
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.71
, liquid water
Weight: 0.70
, steam
Weight: 0.61
, ammonia
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be good for humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nitrous oxide, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nitrous oxide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(nitrous oxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(nitrous oxide, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(nitrous oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(nitrous oxide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(water vapor, be good for humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be good for humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water vapor, be good for humans)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(water vapor, be good for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nitrous oxide, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nitrous oxide, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)