wavelength: affect frequency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect frequency 1.00
have frequency 0.95
be related to frequency 0.95
relate to frequency 0.94
affect frequency of wave 0.91
have lower frequency 0.91
have higher frequency 0.91
be related to frequency for waves 0.88
be related to frequency for wave 0.87
have highest frequency 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(violet, have highest frequency)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have frequency)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(violet, have highest frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(violet, have highest frequency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency of wave)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect frequency of wave)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency of wave)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect frequency of wave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have frequency)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(violet, have highest frequency)