wealth: is distributed poorly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.65
, blessing
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings knowledge
Weight: 0.33
, happiness
Weight: 0.33
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, talent
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is distributed poorly 1.00
be poorly distributed in america 0.93
was distributed in 1920s 0.87
is distributed 0.86
is distributed unequally 0.83
be distributed throughout economy 0.80
be distributed in america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wealth, is distributed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly)