wealth: is distributed unequally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.65
, blessing
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings knowledge
Weight: 0.33
, happiness
Weight: 0.33
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, talent
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is distributed unequally 1.00
is distributed poorly 0.83
is distributed 0.82
was distributed in 1920s 0.81
be poorly distributed in america 0.80
be distributed throughout economy 0.78
is unevenly 0.77
be distributed in america 0.76
be more unequal than income 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed poorly)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed poorly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wealth, is distributed poorly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is unevenly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wealth, be poorly distributed in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed poorly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(wealth, is unevenly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wealth, be distributed throughout economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wealth, be distributed in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wealth, is distributed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wealth, is distributed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wealth, is unevenly)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wealth, is unevenly)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wealth, was distributed in 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is distributed unequally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wealth, is distributed unequally)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wealth, is distributed unequally)