weapon: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
is made 0.96
be made 0.95
were made 0.93
was made during middle ages 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, was made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tool, be made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tool, is made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tool, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(submachine gun, be made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, is made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(weapon, was made)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tool, be made)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(weapon, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(machine gun, is made)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(machine gun, is made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(submachine gun, be made)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(submachine gun, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(weapon, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(weapon, be made)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(weapon, be made)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(weapon, were made)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(weapon, is made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(weapon, be made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(weapon, is made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(weapon, is made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(weapon, is made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made during middle ages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(weapon, was made during middle ages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(weapon, was made during middle ages)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(weapon, was made during middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tool, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(machine gun, is made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(submachine gun, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, was made)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tool, be made)