weatherman: use screen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.46
, expert
Weight: 0.45
, scientist
Weight: 0.44
, group
Weight: 0.43
, idiot
Weight: 0.39
Siblings meteorologist
Weight: 0.33
, astronomer
Weight: 0.30
, television show
Weight: 0.30
, geologist
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
use screen 1.00
use green screen 0.93
use screens 0.90
use green screens 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(film, use green screens)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(film, use green screens)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(film, use green screens)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use green screens)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(film, use green screens)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use screen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(meteorologist, use green screens)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use green screens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weatherman, use screen)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use green screen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use green screens)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screens)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use screens)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(weatherman, use screens)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(weatherman, use green screen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(weatherman, use green screens)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use green screen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use green screens)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(weatherman, use green screen)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(weatherman, use green screens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(film, use green screens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use green screens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(weatherman, use screen)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(film, use green screens)