webcam: is output device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, video
Weight: 0.58
, digital camera
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, projector
Weight: 0.36
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is output device 1.00
is input device 0.81
is input devices 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(webcam, is output device)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, is output device)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(webcam, is output device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is output device)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(projector, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(projector, is output device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(webcam, is output device)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(webcam, is input device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(webcam, is input devices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input device)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(webcam, is input device)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(webcam, is input devices)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(webcam, is input device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(webcam, is output device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is output device)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(projector, is output device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(webcam, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)