well: be done bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, human being
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.31
, body part
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done bad 1.00
go bad 0.86
be done steak bad 0.82
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(well, be done bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, go bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(well, go bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done steak bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, be done steak bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(well, be done bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)