well: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, human being
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.31
, body part
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
be done bad 0.86
is fargo bad 0.82
has quality bad 0.79
be done steak bad 0.77
go dry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(well, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(well, be done bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(well, be done bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, is fargo bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done steak bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, be done steak bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, be done steak bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(well, be done bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(well, go dry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(well, go dry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(well, go dry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(well, is fargo bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(well, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(well, be done steak bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(well, go dry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(well, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)