well: is fargo bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, human being
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.31
, body part
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fargo bad 1.00
is fargo 0.89
go bad 0.82
be fargo in business 0.81
fargo in trouble 0.79
is fargo stock going 0.78
is fargo stock going down 0.78
be fargo in spanish 0.78
fargo charge 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, is fargo bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(well, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(well, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(well, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(well, fargo in trouble)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(well, be fargo in spanish)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo stock going down)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo stock going)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(well, is fargo)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(well, be fargo in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(well, fargo charge)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(well, fargo charge)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(well, be fargo in spanish)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(well, be fargo in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(well, be fargo in spanish)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(well, fargo in trouble)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(well, be fargo in spanish)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(well, is fargo)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(well, is fargo stock going down)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(well, is fargo stock going)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(well, fargo in trouble)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(well, be fargo in business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(well, be fargo in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(well, fargo charge)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(well, is fargo stock going down)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(well, is fargo stock going)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(well, fargo in trouble)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(well, fargo charge)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo stock going down)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo stock going)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(well, is fargo bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)