well: fargo charge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, human being
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.31
, body part
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
fargo charge 1.00
fargo charge for checks 0.84
is fargo 0.82
is fargo bad 0.77
be fargo in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(well, fargo charge)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(well, fargo charge for checks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, is fargo bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(well, is fargo bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(well, be fargo in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(well, is fargo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(well, fargo charge for checks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(well, is fargo bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(well, is fargo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(well, be fargo in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(well, fargo charge for checks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(well, be fargo in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(well, fargo charge for checks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(well, is fargo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(well, be fargo in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(well, fargo charge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(well, fargo charge)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(well, fargo charge)