well: have job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, human being
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.31
, body part
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have job 1.00
work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(field, work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(well, have job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(well, have job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(development, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(field, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(field, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(development, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(like, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(far, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(field, work)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(well, have job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, work)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(well, have job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(far, work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(far, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(like, work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(like, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(well, have job)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(well, work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(well, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(well, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(well, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(well, have job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(field, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(far, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(like, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(well, have job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(field, work)