wendy: is healthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.57
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.57
, woman
Weight: 0.54
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.34
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.34
, william james
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is healthy 1.00
be healthier than mcdonalds 0.77
is chili healthy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wendy, is healthy)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wendy, is chili healthy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(wendy, is chili healthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wendy, is chili healthy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wendy, is chili healthy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wendy, is healthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wendy, is healthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wendy, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is healthy)