wendy: be healthier than mcdonalds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.57
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.57
, woman
Weight: 0.54
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.34
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.34
, william james
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than mcdonalds 1.00
has hate mcdonalds 0.83
is healthy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wendy, is healthy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wendy, is healthy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wendy, is healthy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wendy, is healthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is healthy)