whale: be bigger than fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, ocean
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.90
, blue whale
Weight: 0.86
, whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.82
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.78

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bigger than fish 1.00
be much larger than fish 0.97
were classed as fish 0.76
is big 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(ocean, is big)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ocean, is big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ocean, is big)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be much larger than fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(ocean, is big)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(blue whale, is big)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(blue whale, is big)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(whale shark, is big)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(whale, be bigger than fish)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(whale, were classed as fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(whale, is big)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(whale, were classed as fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(whale, were classed as fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(whale, is big)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(whale, is big)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(whale, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mammal, be much larger than fish)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(ocean, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(whale shark, is big)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(blue whale, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mammal, be much larger than fish)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(ocean, is big)