whale: were classed as fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, ocean
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.90
, blue whale
Weight: 0.86
, whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.82
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.78

Related properties

Property Similarity
were classed as fish 1.00
be bigger than fish 0.76
be much larger than fish 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(whale, were classed as fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be much larger than fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mammal, be much larger than fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(whale, were classed as fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(whale, were classed as fish)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(whale, be bigger than fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale, be bigger than fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whale, be bigger than fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(whale, be bigger than fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(whale, were classed as fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mammal, be much larger than fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(whale, were classed as fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mammal, be much larger than fish)