wight: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.24
, unit
Weight: 0.19
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.27
, coventry
Weight: 0.27
, tasmania
Weight: 0.27
, brisbane
Weight: 0.27
, sheffield
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad in edh 0.87
has quality standard 0.81
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wight, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(creature, be bad in edh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wight, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(creature, be bad in edh)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unit, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(creature, be bad in edh)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(unit, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(coventry, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(creature, be bad in edh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wight, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wight, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tasmania, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(winnipeg, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(coventry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(coventry, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wight, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wight, has quality definition)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wight, has quality definition)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality definition)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wight, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wight, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(creature, be bad in edh)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(winnipeg, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coventry, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tasmania, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(creature, be bad in edh)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(wight, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)