wight: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.24
, unit
Weight: 0.19
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.27
, coventry
Weight: 0.27
, tasmania
Weight: 0.27
, brisbane
Weight: 0.27
, sheffield
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94
has state state 0.79
has state world 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sheffield, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, has state world)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(coventry, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(coventry, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sheffield, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sheffield, has state jobs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(tasmania, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tasmania, jobs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wight, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wight, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(coventry, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tasmania, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wight, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sheffield, has state jobs)
...