wild animals: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be in danger of extinction 0.86
be under threat 0.84
be under threat of extinction 0.80
is dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cougar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cougar, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wild animals, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cougar, is dangerous)