wild animals: eat meat getting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat meat getting 1.00
eat meat 0.96
eat raw meat 0.91
be attracted to cooked meat 0.87
need eat 0.85
eat young 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat raw meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat young)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat young)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wild animals, eat young)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat young)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat meat getting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting)