wild animals: eat raw meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat raw meat 1.00
eat meat 0.95
eat meat getting 0.91
be attracted to cooked meat 0.87
need eat 0.80
eat young 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, eat meat getting)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat meat getting)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat meat getting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat meat getting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wild animals, be attracted to cooked meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat young)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wild animals, eat young)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wild animals, eat young)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat young)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, eat raw meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wild animals, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wild animals, eat raw meat)