wild animals: is endangered

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.67
Siblings	saber-toothed cat Weight: 0.37 , prairie dog Weight: 0.37 , cougar Weight: 0.37 , llama Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is endangered	1.00
be in danger of extinction	0.78
be under threat of extinction	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is endangered)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(cougar, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(cougar, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(cougar, is endangered)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(prairie dog, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(wild animals, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(wild animals, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(cougar, is endangered)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(prairie dog, is endangered)