wildfire: be bad in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in california bad 1.00
be bad in california 1.00
be in california 0.98
get in california 0.98
be in california called 0.97
happen in california 0.95
start in california 0.95
be common in california 0.95
be in like california start 0.95
occur in california 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fire, happen in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, start in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fire, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fire, be in california)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fire, start in california)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fire, happen in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fire, be in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fire, start in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fire, happen in california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fire, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fire, happen in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, start in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad in california)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be in california)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wildfire, be in california)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be in california called)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be in california)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wildfire, be in california called)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be in california called)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wildfire, start in california)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wildfire, start in california)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, start in california)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wildfire, happen in california)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wildfire, happen in california)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, happen in california)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wildfire, get in california)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, get in california)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wildfire, get in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wildfire, occur in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wildfire, occur in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, occur in california)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be common in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be common in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(wildfire, be common in california)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wildfire, be in california called)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wildfire, be in california)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(wildfire, start in california)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wildfire, happen in california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wildfire, occur in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wildfire, get in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildfire, be common in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fire, be in california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fire, start in california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fire, happen in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fire, be in california)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fire, start in california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(wildfire, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fire, happen in california)