wimbledon: be played in white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tournament
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.61
, grand slam
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.56
Siblings olympic games
Weight: 0.34
, match
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, boxing match
Weight: 0.33
, mardi gras
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played in white 1.00
is played 0.92
be played on grass 0.84
is all white 0.79
has color white 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grand slam, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played in white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dvd player, has color white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grand slam, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(dvd player, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dvd player, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wimbledon, be played in white)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wimbledon, is played)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wimbledon, is played)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, is played)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wimbledon, is all white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(wimbledon, has color white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wimbledon, is all white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, is all white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wimbledon, has color white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, has color white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, is all white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, is played)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, has color white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played in white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(grand slam, is played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dvd player, has color white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wimbledon, be played in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(grand slam, is played)