wimbledon: is played

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tournament
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.61
, grand slam
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.56
Siblings olympic games
Weight: 0.34
, match
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, boxing match
Weight: 0.33
, mardi gras
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is played 1.00
be played in white 0.92
be played on grass 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grand slam, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wimbledon, is played)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grand slam, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, is played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wimbledon, is played)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played in white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played on grass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wimbledon, be played in white)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be played in white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be played in white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, is played)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wimbledon, is played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(grand slam, is played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(wimbledon, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(grand slam, is played)