wind: be considered renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.64
, energy
Weight: 0.62
, force
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sail
Weight: 0.56
, bass clarinet
Weight: 0.56
, gale
Weight: 0.40
, solar energy
Weight: 0.37
, solar wind
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered renewable 1.00
be renewable 0.97
is renewable 0.97
be considered source of renewable energy 0.95
be considered renewable resource 0.95
is renewable energy 0.95
have considered renewable energy resources energy 0.92
is renewable source 0.92
is renewable energy source 0.92
source of renewable energy 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(energy, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, is renewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable energy source)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable energy source)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(energy, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, is renewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be renewable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable energy source)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wind, be considered renewable)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wind, is renewable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(wind, is renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wind, is renewable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wind, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable energy source)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solar energy, be renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)