energy: be considered renewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, sector
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered renewable resource 1.00
is renewable resource 0.98
is best renewable resource 0.97
be considered renewable 0.95
be called renewable resources 0.94
is renewable 0.92
is renewable resorce 0.92
be renewable 0.92
be consider renewable 0.91
be classified as renewable 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wind, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wind, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wind, is renewable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be renewable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be renewable)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, is renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be renewable)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be consider renewable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(energy, be consider renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be renewable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(energy, be consider renewable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solar energy, be renewable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wind, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)