window: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.63
, location
Weight: 0.62
, bedroom
Weight: 0.62
, frame
Weight: 0.61
Siblings front door
Weight: 0.78
, window pane
Weight: 0.71
, wall
Weight: 0.65
, door
Weight: 0.64
, tab
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be find in office 0.91
be at office build 0.88
be at office wall 0.83
be at lock in office build 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wall, be find in office)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office build)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in office build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(door, be at office)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(door, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(door, be at office build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wall, be find in office)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wall, be find in office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(door, be at lock in office build)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(door, be at lock in office build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(window, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(window, be find in office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(window, be find in office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(window, be find in office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(window, be at office wall)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(window, be find in office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(window, be at office wall)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(window, be at office wall)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office wall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(window, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wall, be find in office)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(door, be at office build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in office build)