windshield: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.64
, safety glass
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.56
, damage
Weight: 0.55
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.39
, window pane
Weight: 0.36
, front door
Weight: 0.35
, wall
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be for 92 saturns expensive 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(windshield, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(windshield, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(window, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(front door, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(windshield, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(front door, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(front door, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(windshield, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(windshield, be for 92 saturns expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(windshield, be for 92 saturns expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(windshield, be for 92 saturns expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(windshield, be for 92 saturns expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(windshield, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(front door, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)