wine: be healthier than beer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than beer 1.00
be better than beer 0.92
be more expensive than beer 0.89
feel different than beer 0.89
have more alcohol than beer 0.86
be considered of higher class than beer 0.85
love beer 0.83
be superior to other drinks 0.79
be more expensive than liquor 0.79
be superior to drinks 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(wine, be healthier than beer)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wine, be better than beer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than beer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wine, love beer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wine, love beer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, love beer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wine, love beer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than beer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)