wine: have glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have glasses 1.00
glasses 0.99
is glasses 0.99
have different glasses 0.97
be in glass bottles 0.79
be in glass bottle 0.79
have tinted bottles 0.78
be in dark bottles 0.77
be drank with two plastic cups 0.77
be in bottles 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in bottles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in dark bottles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(wine, have glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wine, glasses)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wine, is glasses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wine, glasses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wine, glasses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wine, glasses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wine, is glasses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wine, is glasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wine, is glasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine, be in bottles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in bottles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wine, be in bottles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wine, be in bottles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wine, have glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wine, have glasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red wine, be in bottles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wine, have glasses)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(red wine, be in dark bottles)