wine: have tinted bottles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tinted bottles 1.00
be in dark bottles 0.87
be in glass bottles 0.86
be in bottles 0.85
bottles 0.85
be in green bottles 0.85
is bottles 0.85
be in clear bottles 0.83
be in glass bottle 0.82
be sold in bottles 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red wine, be in green bottles)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in bottles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in dark bottles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in green bottles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wine, bottles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine, be in bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine, is bottles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wine, be in bottles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wine, be in green bottles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(wine, be in green bottles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wine, be in glass bottle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wine, be in bottles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in bottles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine, bottles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(wine, is bottles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, is bottles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wine, bottles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(wine, is bottles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wine, be in green bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wine, have tinted bottles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red wine, be in bottles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine, have tinted bottles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(red wine, be in dark bottles)