winner: best loser

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loser
Weight: 0.67
, runner
Weight: 0.62
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
, title
Weight: 0.60
Siblings win
Weight: 0.58
, english channel
Weight: 0.51
, champion
Weight: 0.36
, victor
Weight: 0.35
, hero
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
best loser 1.00
be important to loser 0.92
distance from loser 0.86
best opponent 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(win, be important to loser)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(champion, best opponent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(champion, best opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(champion, best opponent)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(win, be important to loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(win, be important to loser)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(winner, best loser)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(winner, distance from loser)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(winner, distance from loser)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(winner, distance from loser)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(winner, distance from loser)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winner, best loser)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(winner, best loser)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(win, be important to loser)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winner, best loser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(champion, best opponent)