winner: have cheap clothes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loser
Weight: 0.67
, accolade
Weight: 0.65
, runner
Weight: 0.62
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english channel
Weight: 0.51
, joes
Weight: 0.45
, winning
Weight: 0.43
, filly
Weight: 0.40
, victor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cheap clothes 1.00
have clothes 0.92
is cheap 0.85
wear long socks 0.78
run in underwear 0.77
wear socks 0.77
be in london wear backpacks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(runner, run in underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winner, have cheap clothes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(runner, be in london wear backpacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winner, have cheap clothes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(runner, be in london wear backpacks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(runner, run in underwear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(runner, be in london wear backpacks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(runner, run in underwear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(runner, run in underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(runner, be in london wear backpacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(winner, have cheap clothes)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(winner, have clothes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(winner, have clothes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(winner, have clothes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(winner, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(winner, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(winner, have clothes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(winner, is cheap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(winner, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winner, have cheap clothes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(runner, be in london wear backpacks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(runner, run in underwear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(runner, be in london wear backpacks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(winner, have cheap clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(runner, run in underwear)