winner: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loser
Weight: 0.67
, accolade
Weight: 0.65
, runner
Weight: 0.62
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english channel
Weight: 0.51
, joes
Weight: 0.45
, winning
Weight: 0.43
, filly
Weight: 0.40
, victor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
have cheap clothes 0.85
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(winning, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(winning, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(winning, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(winner, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(winner, have cheap clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winner, have cheap clothes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(winner, have cheap clothes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(winner, have cheap clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(winner, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(winner, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(winner, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(winning, is expensive)