winnipeg: get cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.54
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, quebec
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get cold 1.00
is cold 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(canada, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(winnipeg, get cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canada, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(canada, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(canada, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, get cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(quebec, is cold)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(alaska, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(alaska, is cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(alberta, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alberta, is cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toronto, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toronto, is cold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(montreal, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(montreal, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(winnipeg, get cold)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(winnipeg, is cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(winnipeg, get cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(montreal, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(quebec, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(alberta, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alaska, is cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(winnipeg, get cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)