:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(canada, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, is cold)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canada, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(canada, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
...
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
...
Typicality inheritance from parent to child