:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(montreal, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(toronto, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(montreal, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toronto, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(toronto, is humid)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is cold)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is humid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is humid)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is humid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ottawa, is cold)
Similarity expansion
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ottawa, is humid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ottawa, is humid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ottawa, is humid)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(montreal, is cold)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, is cold)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(montreal, is humid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(toronto, is humid)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(edmonton, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is humid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ontario, is humid)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ottawa, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, is cold)