:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toronto, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ottawa, is humid)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toronto, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is humid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is cold)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is humid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is cold)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ottawa, is humid)
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ottawa, is cold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ottawa, is cold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ottawa, is cold)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is cold)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ottawa, is humid)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(montreal, is cold)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(toronto, is humid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(edmonton, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ontario, is humid)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child